{"id":6758,"date":"2002-06-01T14:41:34","date_gmt":"2012-02-01T11:29:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.nenasilje.net\/?p=6758"},"modified":"2012-02-01T12:29:20","modified_gmt":"2012-02-01T11:29:20","slug":"about-tolerance-and-hate-speech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/about-tolerance-and-hate-speech\/","title":{"rendered":"About tolerance and &#8220;hate&#8221; speech"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>&#8220;Let the neighbour&#8217;s cow be safe and sound&#8221; * \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>by Helena Rill<\/p>\n<p>The changes that have happened after the October 5 of 2000 when the new<br \/>\ngovernment was established, after Slobodan Milo\u0161evi\u00e6 and the old regime had been<br \/>\noverthrown, haven&#8217;t had much effect on hate speech. It remains present in everyday<br \/>\nlife, and often is a part of public communication.<br \/>\nChauvinistic graffiti, attacks on religious and ethnic communities, insults based on<br \/>\nnational, religious, and sexual orientation, doesn&#8217;t make the hate speech any weaker,<br \/>\nbut quite the opposite, even stronger and more harsh, as a result of rage, feelings of<br \/>\ndanger and impotence, as a reaction to the appeal made to the citizens of<br \/>\nSerbia\/Yugoslavia to deal with their own responsibility for the\u00a0 crimes committed in<br \/>\ntheir own name.<br \/>\nAs an example of this practice, in just one week, following panel discussions were<br \/>\neither cancelled or delayed, because threats and anonymous tips were made:<br \/>\na)\u00a0 The threat was made that the Technical Faculty building in \u00c8a\u00e8ak, Serbia, would<br \/>\nbe &#8220;stoned&#8221; if the panel discussion \u201cTruth and Responsibility\u201d was held there.<br \/>\nb) A bomb scare took place at the building of Dom omladine (Youth Home) in<br \/>\nBelgrade, where the discussion of the Postpesimists\u00a0 &#8220;Threathening Phenomenons<br \/>\nTolerance&#8221; was supposed to be held.<br \/>\nThe first time I heard of &#8220;Threathening Phenomenons\u00a0 Tolerance\u201d, I wondered why\u00a0 anyone would consider tolerance to be something threatening. This is especially because<br \/>\nI come from Vojvodina where this word is often used, particularly in political speeches,<br \/>\nfor strengthening one&#8217;s political positions etc. I&#8217;m under the impression, especially when<br \/>\nI&#8217;m feeling apathetic, that this word is such a clich\u00e9, therefore it cannot be perceived as<br \/>\nthreatening and that its real meaning is forgotten. However, I was wrong. Tolerance<br \/>\nbecomes dangerous for some people, and has been proved with this anonymous tip about<br \/>\nthe bomb. In my opinion, it means that resistance is being set up against hate speech,<br \/>\nand those who use this kind of speech are frightened and feel in danger.<br \/>\nWhy is tolerance becoming dangerous? I presume that is because finally it is<br \/>\nbecoming important in it&#8217;s own right. It goes back to its basics, it makes us reconsider<br \/>\nand deal with our own responsibility and ourselves.\u00a0 Unfortunately, I often hear that<br \/>\n&#8220;tolerance means leniency towards opinions, convictions and behaviour we disagree<br \/>\nwith&#8221;; that it is some kind of sufferance so we can all live in happiness and harmony.<br \/>\nFurthermore, I hear it most often in the context of national and religious tolerance, but<br \/>\nwhat about tolerance when it comes to ones with different opinions, different origin or<br \/>\nsexual orientation?<br \/>\nWhat is the essence of tolerance, for me? I perceive it as something much more<br \/>\ndemanding than sufferance, which is, in my opinion, very dangerous, because it reminds me of sweeping the whole thing under the carpet, which is the cause of many problems<br \/>\nin this region, and in general, too. To be more exact, tolerance is not sufferance.<br \/>\nTolerance is an active attitude towards differences, respect for them and it requires an<br \/>\nindividual engagement: reconsideration, cognition of one&#8217;s own responsibilities, needs,<br \/>\nvalues, ideas, getting to know the others and learning about them and their differences.<br \/>\nIt is easy \u201cto be tolerant&#8221; when we think the same and share the same values, but what<br \/>\nhappens when this is not the case?<br \/>\nHowever strange it may sound, I&#8217;m under the impression that&#8217;s where the circle of<br \/>\ncause and effect begins. As a response to hate speech, there&#8217;s a \u201cTolerance\u201d campaign by<br \/>\nthe Federal Ministry for National and Ethnic Communities. A reaction to this campaign is<br \/>\nmore hate, which starts another circle. However, this time it seems to me that the circle<br \/>\nis getting smaller because for the first time in 12 years, the government has made a<br \/>\nstrong statement: we don&#8217;t want hate, we want tolerance.<br \/>\nThe Federal Ministry for National and Ethnic Communities launched the campaign<br \/>\ncalled \u201cTolerance\u201d on the panel discussion &#8220;Threathening Phenomenons\u00a0 Tolerance&#8221;. It<br \/>\ngives hope that things change in Yugoslavia, because the official stand is against hate,<br \/>\nand in favour of a culture of differences. This long-term campaign has started with TV<br \/>\nads in the form of cartoons, easily acceptable, and with the message that one picks up<br \/>\nvery quickly. The leading character in one of these ads is a little cow, and the message of<br \/>\nthe ad is to \u201dlet the neighbour&#8217;s cow be safe and sound\u201d as opposed to the very popular<br \/>\nsaying that goes \u201dlet the neighbour&#8217;s cow drop dead\u201d. The other message is: &#8220;Tolerance.<br \/>\nIt costs nothing, but it&#8217;s worth a lot &#8220;. These messages are placed on billboards in<br \/>\nBelgrade. According to Jelena Markovi\u00e6, a federal assistant minister for national and<br \/>\nethnic communities, the plan is to develop this campaign over the next 2 years, and to<br \/>\nmake it a part of some school programmes.<br \/>\nWhat are the effects of this campaign? Here&#8217;s a story to illustrate it: A man asks a saleswoman for a certain kind of tea, at the market. Since she doesn&#8217;t have it, she sends<br \/>\nhim over to another counter. The man is surprised and he asks her if she is sending him off<br \/>\nto the competition. The woman replies: &#8221; It costs nothing, but it&#8217;s worth a lot &#8220;.<br \/>\nThis panel discussion &#8220;Threathening Phenomenons\u00a0 Tolerance&#8221; has showed me how<br \/>\nstrong the hate still is, how much strength it requires to fight against it, how important<br \/>\nthis step is toward tolerance that the state has taken, and that there are young people in<br \/>\nthe ministry\/Ministry who believe in the things they do and fight for it.<br \/>\nLet&#8217;s be honest. Nothing&#8217;s will happen quickly. It takes years, even decades for the final<br \/>\nresults to come. But, the problem should be addressed with an active approach.<\/p>\n<p>*\u00a0 As opposed to an old saying \u201dLet the neighbour&#8217;s cow drop dead\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Let the neighbour&#8217;s cow be safe and sound&#8221; * \u00a0 by Helena Rill The changes that have happened after the October 5 of 2000 when the new government was established, after Slobodan Milo\u0161evi\u00e6 and the old regime had been overthrown, haven&#8217;t had much effect on hate speech. It remains present in everyday life, and often [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[79],"tags":[295],"class_list":["post-6758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog-en","tag-tolerance"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6758"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6758\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nenasilje.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}